News, reviews and opinions from TEA London, London's exclusive bespoke custom audio visual installation specialist

TEA London News & Views


Archive for the ‘Reviews’


First looks: Philips 42PFL5604H 42″ LCD TV review 0

Posted on April 21, 2010 by Timothy Francis

The now end of life Philips 42PFL5604 represents the 42″ model of entry level 5000 series range. Despite it being Philips’ entry level 42″ LCD TV, it is still a Philips product; this means at around £650 it certainly is not entry-level pricing, but then it certainly does not deliver entry-level performance.

The 42PFL5604 is a compelling choice as an entry level Full-HD 42″ monitor. Large format, entry-level monitors are only capable of displaying screen resolutions of 1024×768, and carry a price tag similar to that of the 42PFL5604. Most TV’s, even Full HD ones, can only display VGA video at resolutions no higher than 1368×720, but Philips are different in this respect, it can natively display VGA at the Full HD resolution of 1920×1080. To get similar results, you would need to spend over  £1400 on a Full HD capable monitor, and you wouldn’t get built-in speakers or the same diversity of inputs.

First impressions

In the box you get a manual, CD manual, remote control and table-top stand.

First impressions of the set is that it is well built, but only as solid as a plastic trim can be. The styling and the bezel is similar to that of a BenQ monitor or even a Sharp LCD TV, nothing spectacular. The curved piano black plastic bezel is fairly chunky, but then it does need to hold a sizeable LCD panel in place. The unit has none of the high-end Philips features such as Ambilight or advanced video post processing.

The back of the unit has only a basic set of inputs, which should be sufficient for most applications, these include VGA, 3 HDMI, 2 SCART, Component, USB and composite. The table-top stand is sturdy and heavy, and provides solid support for the TV set and allows for the set to be pivoted on the base over a reasonable arc.

Usage tests

After powering on the unit you are run through a set-up menu, which is notably, err, prettier than most set-up menus, in fact it is better than most TV sets we have worked with. The same smooth graphical style reappears when the TV provides feedback on remote control commands (volume, input selection, etc). The set-up process also includes basic image calibration process which anybody can complete.

Our tests centred on typical ‘TEA London’ usage scenarios which is almost exclusively computer generated video – Windows Media Centre  et al, so although this is a TV, we have not conducted intensive testing on its tuner capabilities – and given that over half of the FreeView channels are highly compressed, there seemed little point to test this as our viewing would invariably settle on the best, BBC and the worst, Viva/ITV/Five.

VGA output is clear, well defined and sharp. Using standards Windows applications are displayed legibly at our test distance of 3 metres away from the screen. There is a slight softness to text and hairlines, so the display output is not as well defined as a professional monitor, such as the Panasonic TH-42PF11 series plasma monitors, so this monitor is perhaps not the best choice for the display of text based video output, such as spreadsheets, high resolution charts and small text.

With graphics applications it is certainly is comfortable size to be working off. The TV’s settings give you quite a number of display calibration settings, and with some work you can get accurate colour reproduction on the screen, although I would not go so far as to recommend that professional photographers, publishers and graphic designers would use the 42PFL5604 as a primary reference, but if you don’t have the cash for a monitor, this is the next best thing you can buy, although to any professional I would always recommend they spend their £850 on a high-end sub 26″ monitor instead.

When it comes to video, this is where the 42PFL5604 starts to shine. The TV did need some image calibration, the out of the box settings are not bad, but the image can be greatly improved by applying some manual tweaks to the settings applied by the set after running the initial Philips Image Set Up routine. No matter what video we threw at the monitor, it produced an excellent images, that is well defined and shows no strong or visible motion blurring in fast moving scenes. The set smooths out lower resolution video cleanly, and shows pin-sharp definition with HD content such as blu-ray movies. In fact we can find very little wrong with the 42PFL5604’s performance considering its price point, you would be hard pressed to find something with similar performance for the same money.

So what we have is a TV set that is capable of being used as a monitor which opens up a number of possibilities at this very compelling price point. To put it simply, no TV can match the sharpness and brightness of a professional monitor, nor would a TV be flexible to reliably display resolutions other than its native resolution. The build quality of professional monitors is far better than any entry to mid-high level TV, the monitor will have a glass front, normally uses a higher quality display panel and is engineered to have a very long lifespan – so please do not take this review as an endorsement that a TV should be chosen over a monitor for computer generated video, but the Philips 42PFL5604 does provide you with a compelling choice for an entry level large format LCD display.

Two wireless keyboards worth considering for the front room media PC 1

Posted on March 23, 2010 by Timothy Francis

TEA London always advise clients to strongly consider installing a dedicated home theatre PC (HTPC or MCE) in their front room, as opposed to installing several hardware units that collectively can perform the same function as one machine.We will perhaps write a different article in the future which can convey all of the benefits and virtues of a HTPC over the more traditional approach of installing dedicated components, such as a blu-ray player, PVR and so on, to perform these same tasks.

We currently recommend Windows 7 based machines for these purposes, and with that in mind this article specifically mentions equipment that has been used and tested on Windows based PC’s. It is likely these PC’s are compatible with other operating systems such as MAC OS and Linux, however we suggest you check with the manufacturer and supplier first before making any purchases based on our recommendations.

Key features

We have been building, installing and support HTPC’s for over 5 years now, and in this time we have tried and tested a number of wireless control systems, i.e. keyboards, mice and remote controls. We primarily assess the suitability of these controllers for simple and accessible media control; after all the MCE PC is more often than not going to be used for the playback and control of media such as videos, photos and music, so there is little point in a keyboard not having buttons to control volume, playback, and so on.

The next, and perhaps the most important feature the controller needs is its wireless range. Most wireless keyboards systems have very limited range, most on the market are limited to only 2 Metres or less, despite what the manufacturer may claim. Most wireless are designed to work within a limited range for a number of reasons, the most obvious being that generally speaking keyboard and mice tend to be placed on a desk, and are normally very close to the wireless receiver, some manufacturers put the controller’s receiver unit onto an extension cable, so you can place the wireless receiver within inches of the keyboard and mouse. The advantage of this should equate to lower power consumption and therefore a longer battery life. The practicalities of the same principles being applied in the front room however is less than ideal. For one you want to have complete freedom of movement where you can be within 1 metre of the wireless receiver or 5 metres away from the receiver. You do not necessary want any wires dangling out of your AV storage unit underneath your TV, nor do you necessarily want a cable to be pulled from the TV/PC to the back of the so you can ensure you are with range of the wireless receiver. Using a keyboard with a limited range can be an incredibly frustrating experience, where if you move a keyboard only a few inches to the left or right, the keyboard may very well go out of range, or worse only some of the keys you press are received by the computer.

It is because of this, above all else, that the range of the wireless keyboard/mouse/controller is perhaps the most important consideration. As a rule of thumb, the more office orientated, and certainly the less expensive the keyboard, the less suitable it will be for the task. We have found that keyboards that use radio frequencies (RF) in the 2.4GHz band tend to work very well, and there are a few on the market that run at much higher frequencies than this; these theoretically should give a longer range and more reliable transmission of commands.

That said, we can now move onto our brief review of our two current favourite wireless keyboard and mouse combinations.

Logitech Dinovo Mini

Dinovo Mini

The Dinovo mini has been a favourite of ours for a few years now, I personally use one on my HTPC. There is very little not to like about the unit, and when it is demonstrated to prospective clients, it is always met with great approval. On the plus side it connects using Bluetooth connectivity, the Dinovo comes with a Bluetooth fob which plugs into any USB port in your computer. We have found that it is better to insert this fob into, if you have them, the front USB ports of the computer. We have had some erratic results with the range of the keyboard when inserting it into one of the rear USB ports, we can only assume that this is because there is far more electronic noise or interference at the rear of PC than there is at the front. Although you are bringing the receiver closer to the keyboard, this is only by a foot or two, but we have found that the overall workable range of the keyboard increases considerably. We found in some scenarios the range of the keyboard was only 2-3 metres when inserted in the rear of the PC, but this increases to well over 6 metres (more than ample for the average front room) when using a front USB port.

The unit comes with its own rechargeable battery and power supply. We found that through standard use of the keyboard,, the battery lasts over 2 weeks between charges, sometimes longer through light use. The unit does conserve power automatically, and tends to put the keyboard in standby when its lid is shut. the unit does indicate when the battery is running low, it does give plenty of warning when it needs charging, further you can use the keyboard when it is plugged into its charger, so you do not have to wait for the unit to charge up in order to use it. You can use it whilst plugged in with ease. We have not measured the charging time, but it is fairly long, over 4 hours would be our estimate, so being able to use it whilst charging is handy if you accidentally let the battery run completely down.

In essence this is a keyboard you would hold in the palms of your hand, and you would type with your thumbs. A process which may sound a little odd, but is surprisingly easy to do. This is obviously not the ideal keyboard for those of you who intend doing  a lot of typing on your HTPC, such as responding to emails on a regular basis, and so on; but for those of you who merely need to do the odd internet search, or type in the odd bit of information here and there, this is an ideal choice for the front room.

Its has a neat compact design that would allow it to find in with any front room’s décor. It certainly looks less obtrusive than the average remote control. It features a lid that neatly protects the keyboard, so if it slips off a sofa’s arm and ends up in between the cushions, the unit is quite well protected from accidental damage, and accidental key-presses.

One of the nicest features of the keyboard, is its integrated touch-pad mouse. It responds accurately to the tracking performed with your right thumb. it works just as well as a standard mouse. This touch-pad has a dual personality, where is can also acts as standard navigation keys, i.e. left, right,up and down, making it ideal for navigating through menu systems such as Windows Media Centre. You can switch between ‘mouse mode’ and ‘navigation key mode’ by toggling a switch that is located very close to the touchpad; it is close enough for the modes to be selected using your right thumb, and thus all navigation tasks can easily be performed by just the one digit of your hand.

The keyboard features a full set of media controls at the top of the keyboard, so you will be able to control the playback of media easily. The top media controls also include volume and mute controls. The left side buttons enable easy channel changing in Media Centre.

The only real niggles we have found with the keyboard, is because of its very compact size, not all keys are present on the keyboard. So certain buttons have to be accessed using the keyboards FN key. To, for example, press CTRL-SHIFT-ESCAPE you have to press 4 keys simultaneously, which on such a compact unit feels like you are performing a Vulcan nerve pinch; if you consider the keyboard is designed for thumb typing, this means you have to use more than just your thumbs to perform certain keystrokes. The keyboard also lacks function keys… so calling for help or doing a page refresh is no longer a simple, single keypress.

At around £80 this is not a cheap keyboard, and niggles aside, it is almost the perfect keyboard for the front room. Having used one for some years now, I can vouch for the reliability and build quality of the Dinovo Mini. No problems have been experienced with it, and the battery still seems as strong as it was from the start, so from first impressions to long term use, this unit has never failed to impress

Gyration Air Mouse Go Plus

Compact Gyration wireless keyboard

Gyration wireless keyboard

The Gyration Air Mouse Go Plus is a keyboard and mouse suite that follows the more traditional looking approach to a keyboard and mouse combination. In fact the keyboard is fairly unremarkable looking in many respects. Just a small compact keyboard with a removable lid, that clips neatly underneath the keyboard so you don’t have to contend with it lying around or going missing.

What makes the Gyration suite good is the mouse, which we will come to shortly. Firstly we will talk about the keyboard. Despite appearances the keyboard is of a rugged design, but is still lightweight and compact enough to sit comfortably on your lap or sofa arm. There is a nice feel to the keys, where each press is definite and responsive. The keyboard has a single indicator light, which lights up with each key press. this is very useful feedback it not only tells you whether you did hit a key properly, but provides you with feedback that the keyboard is working (i.e. batteries are not flat) and key presses are being sent.

There are a full set of media controls at the top of the keyboard as well as user definable shortcut keys.

The primary reason why we recommend the Gyration keyboard is its range… it is just phenomenal. the manufacturer states that the range is up to 30 metres on this model, with other models achieving much further distances. Given what the average size of a room is in the UK, it is likely you could type from several rooms away if it were practical to do so.  There are few others on the market that can achieve these distances with the reliability of the Gyration keyboard.

The keyboard uses two standard AA batteries. You can opt to install rechargeable batteries, but there is no means of charging these batteries whilst they are installed in the keyboard. We have found through extended use that bog standard Duracell batteries last well over 4 months with standard use. In some areas where the keyboard performs lighter activities, such as boardroom and presentation applications, the battery life has exceeded a year – proving that despite the incredible range of this keyboard, it is still incredibly energy efficient.

Gyration air mouse

Gyration air mouse

Gyration comes into its own, and the brand name makes more sense when you take a look at their mouse. The Gyration mouse behaves and functions like any other ordinary optical mouse, where it can be used on any suitable flat surface and tracks movements with good accuracy. It is however not designed to be used exclusively as a traditional mouse, can also be use in the ‘air’ in a similar fashion to a Wii controller. The mouse has a ‘trigger’ button on the underside of the mouse, which when engaged activates its ‘gyration’ function. Simple arm movements can then move a mouse on screen.  It takes a little getting used to, but after a few minutes of use, you do get the hang of it, and you are able to control mouse functions as well as a normal surface based mouse. The fact that the mouse can be used in the air is useful from a front room perspective… no need for a flat surface to be found in order to use the mouse, just pick it up and wave it around.

The mouse does include a rechargeable battery and a charging dock. The battery life is nowhere near as good as the keyboard. The mouse sadly loses charge if you leave it off it s dock. We have have foudn that the mouse can discharge itself without use only after a week or two. So this means that it is safer to leave the mouse on charge when not in use. This is our only real critcism of an otherwise great product.

The Gyration suit is ideal for those of you who need a normal keyboard for typing in the front room. It is compact enough to be tucked away neatly, but large enough for it to feel and function as well as a standard keyboard does. The mouse’s air function makes it perfect for the front room too, where you are no longer constrained to work from a flat surface.

At a retail price of around £89, it is similarly priced to the Dinovo Mini, so you decide which is better for your needs.

remember you can always use these in conjunction with a Media Centre Remote control (or universal remote control) so for the Gyration option ijn particular you can keep it tucked away for those lengthy typing and mouse controlled applications, and use a remote control for typical media control. We like the £20 Compro K300 remote control, which includes the all important Media Centre compatible USB infra-red receiver fob.

First looks: Yamaha RX-V465 review 0

Posted on January 27, 2010 by Timothy Francis
Yamaha RX-V465

Yamaha RX-V465 AV receiver

First Looks

The 2009/2010 range of Yamaha home surround amplifiers are noticeably smaller than most AV receivers on the market. Make no mistake, the more heavy-weight units still are of similar size to the original amplifier units, but the lower end of the range, the footprint of these units are smaller than previous versions. It is roughly the footprint and height of a component tape-deck. The smaller footprint means the unit will be able to fit onto shelves and storage units with limited depth, which can be an important consideration when selecting a product.

The look and feel of the RXV465 is as solid and well made as the mid-range amplifiers, and there is no noticeable skimping on product quality despite its very attractive price tag, until we took a look at the rear.

We were mildly disappointed by some of the rear connections, the surround speaker terminals are push terminals, rather than a standard 4mm binding post; be aware of this, there is little point in investing in decent speaker cable terminations for anything other than you front left and right speakers. This approach may be to save precious space on the unit, but these sort of connections are more akin to budget, or home-cinema in a box surround systems. Considering this unit is capable of cleanly driving some weighty speakers, we feel this minor cost saving in manufacturing may be indicative that other aspects of the unit are cheapened to save a few more pennies on its manufacturing costs, and these cost savings may be lurking underneath the RXV465’s skin.

Capabilities

As the RXV465 is a very well priced unit, putting it well within the reach of the tightest of budgets, it is bound to have some weaknesses, or a reduction in capabilities when compared to its mid-ranged siblings that would cost £200 more.

Yamaha RX-V465 rear connections

Yamaha RX-V465 rear connections

The RXV465 is a 5-Channel surround amplifier, delivering 105W per channel when configured with 5 speakers, a lot of AV receivers are 7 channel (or more). The lack of the extra surround channels means the unit can’t handle the more advanced sound tracks available, it also consequently can’t be configured as a 2 or 3 zone amplifier.

The unit is capable of decoding all major sound track types including HD audio, we consider this to be vital a feature when considering any new AV receiver purchase. In order to get the most out of modern blu-ray movies, you really do need to ensure you curround amplifier supports both DTS-HD and Dolby True-HD sound formats, and the RX-V465 does both as well as all of the preceding DTS and Dolby sound formats; this is perhaps one of the amplifier’s most salient features, as it does mean the unit is bang up-to-date and capable of decoding the most demanding audio sound tracks found on blu-ray movies.

The 4 HDMI inputs should be plenty for the average front room, giving you enough HDMI inputs to cover a games console, PC, satellite receiver and disc player. There are additional inputs for analogue connections, including component video, s-video and composite video. There are 2 optical and 2 digital coaxial connections, we feel this should be sufficient, albeit somehwat limited; keep in mind that connecting a SKY receiver will take one of the Optical inputs; HDMI V1.3 support will however ensure that as long as your other source components are V1.3 compliant, audio can be delivered through these ports.

Be aware that the RX-V465 does not have any video scaling capabilties, it will output the video signal it receives, using the same signal output type as the input, i.e. if you intend connecting source components that use video signals other than HDMI, you will need to connect your TV or monitor to the same outputs on the RX-V465; for example if you are connecting up devices that use HDMI, component video and composite video, you will need to connect the same cables from the Yamaha to your TV set; if you consider the cost implications and clutter this may create, you may be better off considering slightly more expensive AV receivers that are capable of upscaling, such as the RX-V565 or better.

Review

For our tests we thought we should set the RX-V465 through its paces using a comparable budget priced speaker system. We opted to use the ever popular and award winning Q-Acoustics Q-AV system for the front speaker array with a Monitor Audio Vector VW10 subwoofer. We used our RED-JNR media centre PC as audio and video player and a Panasonic TX-P42g10 plasma TV as a monitor.

We initially configured the surround system using Yamaha’s automatic sound calibration system known as YPAO; this is an automatic equalisation and calibration procedure. It is a simple procedure that requires you to plug in a small microphone supplied with the RX-V465, placing the microphone at the ideal listening/seating position, and starting the sequence.

We were rather disappointed with the results of the YPAO calibration, and found that it is better configured manually. We have read elsewhere that some Yamaha amps are better configured manually, and this is certainly one of those cases. Maybe the close proximity of the LCR speakers on the Q-AV speaker system is a cause for this anomaly, or perhaps this is because YPAO only takes one measurement for calibration with smaller models.

After we manually configured the speakers and deactivated DSP processing, the speakers sound absolutely wonderful, detailed, spacial and responsive. The Yamaha drives a very crisp and clean sound, leaving your speakers to eak out the tonal nuances out of your sound tracks. The opening scene on Inglorious Basterds created a perfect eeriness and tension to the polite SS interrogation, to sharp and loud gunfire at the end of the scene. Further scenes revealed that the RX-V465 not only delivers the sound sounds clearly, but seems to do so effortlessly, even when there are rapid changes from loud to soft.

The RX-V465 adds a great sense of motion and ambience to the video. In fact we can find no real faults with it with when watching DVD or Blu-Ray discs from our RED-jnr BDS media centre. All sound playback from the RED was clear, well defined and fettered.

TV sound is often limited by how well or uncompressed the broadcaster chooses to transmit their video, so there will be variations in sound quality and equalisation. We found that the Yamaha’s DSP came handy in adding some body and clarity to poor quality or 2-dimensional sound. A good reference channel such as BBC HD was found sound to be very clear and spacious both from the TV’s own tuner and from the RED-JNR.

Normally AV receivers are not very good for stereo playback, but I found the Yamaha to be a very satisfying listening experience at any volume., however if you play opt to play stereo in 2.1 sound mode do you get a really complete and satisfying audio experience.

Conclusions

The Yamaha RX-V465 is a great amplifier choice for those of you just starting with hi-fi surround sound systems, or if you are on a really tight budget. I would go no less expensive than this amplifier. For similar money there is some competition in this field both the Denon AVR-1610 (1 less HDMI input) and Onkyo TX-SR507 (not Panasonic friendly) are very worthy alternatives with some strengths over the Yamaha.

Product information

Price: £345
Available Finishes: Black, Titanium

Specifications

Channnels 5.1-channel
RMS Power (8 ohms, 20Hz-20kHz) [THD] 105W x 5 [0.9%] (1kHz)
Advanced Features iPod Compatibility via Yamaha Universal Dock Yes
Bluetooth Compatibility via Bluetooth® Wireless Audio Receiver Yes
Front Panel Mini Jack Input Yes
SCENE Yes
FM/AM Tuner Yes
YPAO Sound Optimization Yes
Compressed Music Enhancer Yes
Adaptive DRC (Dynamic Range Control) Yes
Initial Volume and Maximum Volume Setting Yes
Audio Delay for Adjusting Lip-Sync Yes (0-240 ms)
Remote Control Unit Preset
High Sound Quality 192kHz/24-Bit DACs for All Channels Yes (Burr-Brown)
Dolby TrueHD Yes
Dolby Digital Plus Yes
DTS-HD Master Audio Yes
Dolby Digital EX Yes
DTS-ES Discrete 6.1, DTS 96/24 Yes
Pure Direct Direct Mode
High Picture Quality 1080p-Compatible HDMI Yes
Deep Color (30/36 Bit) Yes
x.v.Color Yes
100/120Hz and 1080p/24Hz Refresh Rates Yes
Auto Lip-Sync Compensation Yes
Surround Realism DSP Program 17
Adaptive DSP Level Yes
SILENT CINEMA / Virtual CINEMA DSP Yes
Extensive Connection / Multi-Zone Control HDMI Inputs/Outputs 4 / 1
Audio Digital Inputs (Optical / Coaxial) 4 (2 / 2)
Component Video Inputs / Output 2 / 1
Front Panel Video Aux Terminals Mini Jack
Preout Terminals Sb/Sw
Dynamic Power/Channel (8/6/4/2 ohms) -/110/130/150 W
Total Harmonic Distortion (20 Hz-20 kHz, CD) 0.06%
Signal-to-Noise Ratio (CD, 250 mV) 100 dB
Dimensions (W x H x D) 435 x 151 x 364 mm
Weight 8.4 kg

Timothy Francis
TEA London Limited



↑ Top